How many coral reefs are there in the world




















The project gives tour operators resilience, enabling them to be much more adaptive in the face of change, he adds. Just as diversification builds resilience for livelihoods, so it is essential for reef ecosystems, and reef networks connected by ocean currents, to allow migrating larvae move and adapt. We need to conserve hot sites, which are important sources of heat-tolerant corals, as well as colder sites that can become important future habitats. Others want to intervene further by selectively implanting heat-tolerant varieties, including lab-grown polyps, or even using Crispr, a rapid gene-editing technology, to produce genetically engineered versions.

In , researchers described 23 different ways to improve the resilience and persistence of coral reefs. Those experiments showed that heat-adapted corals can thrive in new environments and could be an important source of reef regeneration. One place to look would be the Gulf of Aqaba in the northern Red Sea. Due to a quirk of geology, the corals there have evolved adapted to harsh hot conditions, with the result that they are not simply heat-tolerant, they thrive better as the water heats, growing faster.

She believes these corals represent a precious and unique population — they could be the last coral reefs standing at the end of the century. And yet they are currently poorly protected , threatened by pollution and rampant coastal development, which compromises their resilience. Indeed, one study showed that coral that survived bleaching on the Great Barrier Reef in had twice the average heat tolerance the following year.

Separate lab research reveals that corals can pass on their adaptive strategies to their offspring. Timing is everything, though.

When coral dies or is destroyed, the reef shrinks,a problem exacerbated by current sea level rise, making it harder for new corals to grow because their habitat is depth-specific. And when you lose a coral reef, you are losing the entire ecosystem, not simply a few species of coral.

India bets its energy future on solar—in ways both small and big. Environment Planet Possible India bets its energy future on solar—in ways both small and big Grassroots efforts are bringing solar panels to rural villages without electricity, while massive solar arrays are being built across the country.

Epic floods leave South Sudanese to face disease and starvation. Travel 5 pandemic tech innovations that will change travel forever These digital innovations will make your next trip safer and more efficient.

But will they invade your privacy? Go Further. Animals Wild Cities This wild African cat has adapted to life in a big city. Animals This frog mysteriously re-evolved a full set of teeth. Animals Wild Cities Wild parakeets have taken a liking to London.

Animals Wild Cities Morocco has 3 million stray dogs. Meet the people trying to help. Animals Whales eat three times more than previously thought.

Environment Planet Possible India bets its energy future on solar—in ways both small and big. Environment As the EU targets emissions cuts, this country has a coal problem. Paid Content How Hong Kong protects its sea sanctuaries. History Magazine These 3,year-old giants watched over the cemeteries of Sardinia. Coral reefs are essential to healthy coasts and vibrant economies, playing a critical role in everything from protecting lives and property to supporting thousands of businesses.

The total economic value of coral reef services for the U. Worldwide, more than million people depend on coral reefs for food, income, coastal protection, and more. This means that not only do different corals respond differently to warmer temperatures, the magnitude of these differences really depends on how extreme the warming event is and the amount of stress they are put under.

Changes in reefs will also reflect differences in how quickly corals recover and grow. If some corals bleach — and possibly die off — much more easily than other species, it seems likely that reefs will begin to be dominated by the most resilient ones. This seems likely. But sensitivity to bleaching is just one part of the story. We also need to consider how quickly corals can recover and grow. If corals that bleach easily then bounce back quickly, they might be able to maintain their spot on the reef.

Conversely, if more resilient corals that experience only moderate bleaching take 10 to 20 years to recover and grow back slowly, they could lose theirs.

Researchers have looked at this dynamic between some specific corals in detail. The two corals which dominate many reefs in the Indo-Pacific region — which includes corals off the coasts of Southeast Asia and the Great Barrier Reef — are Acropora palmata and Porites. These corals could not be more different. Porites is much more resilient. But their growth rates and recovery times are also very different: Acropora grows quickly; Porites grows slowly. This means infrequent but severe disturbances tend to favor Acropora because it can grow back quickly.

But moderate, frequent events tend to favor Porites which is much less-affected by moderate warming. Models that look at the dynamics of these two corals on a reef system suggest that Acropora continues to dominate as long as the interval between bleaching events is more than two years.

If the interval between events is less than two years then Porites starts to dominate because even the fast-growing Acropora cannot recover quickly enough. Researchers therefore expect susceptible corals like Acropora to decline in abundance as a result of increased warming.

But depending on the frequency of bleaching events they may not decline by as much as their response to heat stress would suggest. The corals themselves can adapt and acclimatize to changing temperatures through genetic changes in the host, or changes in the selection of heat-resistant symbionts.

But reefs as a whole can also change and adapt, with more resilient species becoming more dominant while others die away. Reef assemblages will be different. Just how different, and how much coral cover we will lose completely will depend on the intensity and frequency of extreme bleaching events. The research suggests that corals themselves can adapt to changes — but only up to a certain point.

More and more extreme events will push beyond these limits. Human emissions are driving climate change. The intensity of coral bleaching depends on how much greenhouse gases we emit. When we think of the impacts of carbon dioxide CO 2 emissions we tend to focus on its impact on climate change. But for marine organisms, these emissions pose a double threat.

CO 2 emissions could risk the future of marine life, including coral reefs through ocean acidification. If we emit more than can be absorbed by forests, other vegetation and the ocean, then the atmospheric concentration increases. The Global Carbon Project shows this nicely in the graphic.

What this means is that the ocean absorbs a lot of CO 2. As we can see from the chart — the amount of absorbed CO 2 has been increasing over time as a result of increased emissions from fossil fuels. Now, on to chemistry. When CO 2 is absorbed in water, it reacts to form other substances. When we combine CO 2 and water H 2 O we get carbonic acid. This reaction occurs:. So we can see that through these reactions, our seawater becomes increasingly acidic. This chain of reactions was started by adding CO 2 to the water.

The pH of water does decrease being more acidic when we add CO 2 , but not quite as much as we might expect. It creates reactions to work against this process. Overall, there are two outcomes of adding CO 2 to water. First, the pH decreases a bit and our water becomes more acidic.

Second, some carbonate CO 3 ions are consumed to buffer against this process. Why does this matter? Why are carbonate ions so important? Corals and other marine life build their shells and exoskeletons using the mineral calcium carbonate CaCO 3.

To build them, they need carbonate ions in the water. Clearly, as carbonate reacts with CO 2 , we end up with less and less in the water. Less carbonate for marine life to form their shells.

Corals then risk the dissolution of their current skeletons and struggle to form new ones. When the erosion rate of organisms is higher than the rate that they can build new skeletons, they slowly disappear. This leads to the question of how much ocean acidification we might expect to see in the coming century.

Or will reefs struggle to survive and grow? There are two elements of this question. First, how do we expect our emissions of CO 2 to affect the chemistry of seawater? Second, how will corals respond to these changing conditions? Scientists can try to test future acidification in controlled experiments. They can expose corals to waters with different concentrations of dissolved CO 2 — mimicking the process of human emissions — and monitor how they respond.

Many experiments have tried to look at the response of corals to this acidification. This is because most of the experiments have exposed corals to CO 2 concentrations that are much higher than we expect to see in the real world. As we cover in a related article , Hughes et al. Another third ranged from to ppm, and the remaining third were over 1, ppm.

Atmospheric concentrations of CO 2 would have to almost double from around to ppm. Even the worst and unrealistically higher scenarios of CO 2 emissions barely reach ppm by the end of the century. They continue to grow as normal. But above ppm, their rate of calcification begins to decline. This concentration of ppm is getting closer to the concentrations of CO 2 that we might begin to see by the end of the century.

They can bleach or die from warming oceans but also by ocean acidification; the dissolution of CO 2 in the oceans can make it increasingly difficult for corals to build their carbonate exoskeletons. This needs to be in line with realistic projections of what we might expect from emissions in the coming decades or century. The oceans experience different changes in temperature. The average tropical sea surface temperature increased by 0.

There is also a lot of spatial and temporal variation across the oceans: corals are particularly vulnerable to spikes in summer water temperatures, and this can vary a lot from location to location. If the world was to follow the lowest emissions scenario RCP2. The problem is that most experiments which look at the temperature and acidification effects on corals have focused on temperatures and CO 2 concentrations that are much higher than this.

In a paper published in Nature , Terry Hughes and colleagues looked at the range of experimental studies that had been done on coral responses to climate change. These experiments expose corals to one or more treatments of elevated water temperatures for periods ranging from a single day to a year or longer. Or in the case of ocean acidification, expose them to waters with varying concentrations of dissolved CO 2.

The chart shows the distribution of experimental conditions in the studies. The height of each bar represents how often a given temperature or CO 2 concentration had been assessed.

In fact, no study had done experiments on the biological response of corals to temperature increases in the 0. The same is true for experiments on ocean acidification. Since pre-industrial times, the average pH of the ocean surface waters has declined by about 0. This will confine the optimal conditions for coral calcification to a narrower band across the equator.

But, these studies are based on very high emissions scenarios such as RCP8. This is not what we should expect. As we see in the chart, most experiments have been conducted at very high CO 2 concentrations. Most experiments were designed to match conditions of unconstrained greenhouse gas emissions. The lowest concentrations started at ppm: one-third of experiments ranged from to ppm. Another third ranged from to ppm; and the remaining third were over 1, ppm.

The corals would have died from severe warming already. What this review highlights is the massive gap in our understanding of what corals will face under realistic warming and acidification conditions over the next century. We need to adjust the range of temperature and pH conditions that we test corals under. Explore the diversity of wildlife across the planet — how many species are in each group, and where they live. See how wild mammal populations have changed over time; where they live today; and where they are threatened with extinction.

Explore the diversity of birds across the world; how many species have gone extinct; and how populations are changing. Explore the distribution of coral reefs across the world and how they are changing from human pressures.

The Living Planet Index is one of the most-common biodiversity metrics. Hunting is one of the largest threats to wildlife. See how poaching rates and trade has changed over time, and across species. See how human expansion and habitat loss has changed landscapes over millennia, and how this has impacted global biodiversity. Summary More than 2, species of coral have been identified and described. Most coral reefs are found in the tropics and subtropics.

Although recent research suggests this figure could be an overestimate. Corals face multiple threats, including mass bleaching, overfishing, pollution of local waters, and ocean acidification.

Mass bleaching events are becoming more common and severe. The time between bleaching events is getting shorter — often too short for corals to recover from.

Some corals die immediately when exposed to warming. Others bleach, then either recover or die. Some corals are much more resilient to warming than others. More experiments of coral responses at lower levels of warming and acidification are needed.

Number of coral species. We see that there are more than 2, described coral species in the world. Click to open interactive version. What are coral reefs?

Where do we find coral reefs? You will find most coral reefs in the tropics and subtropics. Global distribution of shallow-water coral reefs 8 Related chart:. Endemic reef-forming coral species. Corals threatened with extinction today. Threats to coral reefs. Coral reefs are home to some of the most diverse and oldest ecosystems on Earth. Type of disturbance Human pressure Impact on corals Solution Greenhouse gas emissions Warmer waters from climate change Bleaching, resulting in coral mortality Reduce greenhouse gas emissions Ocean acidification from more CO 2 Dissolution of corals, and reduced growth rates Reduce CO 2 emissions Potential increase in intensity and frequency of storms Physical damage to the structure of coral reefs; in-tact coral can be destroyed Reduce greenhouse gas emissions Fishing and shipping Overfishing Loss of coral and the ecosystems they support Marine protected areas MPAs Destructive fishing with explosives Localised, acute loss of coral reefs Marine protected areas MPAs Shipping lanes, anchors and boat groundings Destruction of physical structure of coral reefs Marine protected areas MPAs Pollution Sewage and nutrient runoff from land Replacement of coral with algae.

Higher risk of disease. Impaired growth from toxins or heavy metals. Marine protected areas MPAs. Regulation on sewage disposal and coastal agriculture. Sedimentation from coastal development Particles cloud the water and block sunlight, reducing coral growth Regulations on coastal development around reef zones Invasive species Possible introduction of disease and competition with existing species Limit introductions to native species, or carefully selected new species.

Coral bleaching.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000